Posts Tagged ‘portfolio’

How to Protect from Inflation

July 27th, 2009

inflation_wheel_barrelSpecter of Inflation

Only six months ago, inflation was the last thing on anyone’s mind.  Deflation threatened as prices — especially energy prices — plunged to record lows.  Following massive Fed and government intervention, focus has shifted.  While deflation is still a possibility, it is now unlikely given the enormous amounts of money being injected into the economy.

With massive sums of money being injected into the economy — a table in a recent Fed report indicated that the potential support to the economy could reach 21 trillion dollars — inflation is the more likely scenario.  Only a small fraction of the money being used to support the economy is coming from the existing money supply.  Most of the money being injected into the economy — through TARP, the Commercial Paper program, treasury buying, etc — comes from newly minted money.  The Fed is doing what the Fed does best; it prints dollars.

I agree with most of what the Fed is doing.  The economy needed massive stimulus to avert a complete meltdown, and continues to need a lot of stimulus.  The problem is with balance.  Forecasting the economy — or even measuring its current state — is a job best done by palm readers and astrologers.  Even a slight over stimulation of the economy — say $200 billion — can cause substantial inflation.  With the Fed throwing around trillions of dollars, getting the right balance of stimulus becomes nearly impossible.  Higher-than-normal inflation is almost a certainty.

A little bit of inflation is a good thing.  In the United States, we seem to like it where it does not approach threatening proportions in the 2-4% range.  In reality, inflation rates anywhere between 2-8% are considered healthy.  Many countries comfortably handle 8% inflation rates without any negative economic impact.  Nevertheless, with the amount of stimulus in the economy, the possibility of inflation higher than 8% is significant, and whereas hyperinflation was previously an impossibility, it is now possible, albeit unlikely.

Forget about Gold

Whenever inflation comes up, so does gold.  I honestly cannot explain to you what gold has to do with inflation, since the world is no longer using gold as a currency standard.  Gold does make some sense on the level that it is a commodity, and all commodities tend to rise in price with inflation since they tend to be priced in dollars.  I personally suggest avoiding gold. Gold is the first refuge of panicky idiots, and as such suffers from wild speculatory swings.  Instead, consider buying into a no-load commodity mutual fund — diversifying among commodities, including agricultural products, metals, oil and natural gas, will protect you from speculators and inflation alike.  From a value perspective, I’m not convinced that now is the best time to buy into commodities, but buying into any significant dips may be beneficial in the long-term.

Stocks

Stocks have natural inflation protection.  So long as the inflation is not at the panic-inducing level, stocks will benefit.  Stock prices tend to rise with inflation because of both the inflationary effects buying the actual shares and the higher nominal revenues/earnings associated with inflation.

To double-up the effect, buying stocks that are strongly connected to a commodity is a way to avoid dealing with the commodities market.  I recently recommended natural gas company, EnCana.

Bonds

Bonds and cash are typically thought of as the enemy to an investor in inflationary times.  This is not necessarily true.  Treasuries can be a drag on a portfolio when inflation is high, but not all bonds are treasuries.  Investors preparing for an inflationary environment may consider weighting their bond portfolio more heavily towards higher-yield bonds, such as investment-grade corporate bonds or a high yield bond mutual fund.  While returns may or may not outpace inflation, they will certainly be less of a drag than treasuries.  Nevertheless:

keep in mind that an inflationary environment can be an excellent time to buy good bonds at cut-rate prices.

The exception is with TIPS.  TIPS, or Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, are a new type of treasuries that track inflation.  One can buy them directly, or through a TIPs mutual fund.

Most Importantly, Go Global

I cannot understate the importance of having a global portfolio.  The world of investment opportunities does not exist within the boundaries of the United States.  By diversifying assets globally, one mitigates issues that affect only the United States, especially inflation.  By investing in stocks, bonds, and even CD’s internationally, one can reduce inflation and currency risk in the aggregate.

That Being Said…Don’t Overdo It

A good portfolio shouldn’t need tremendous tweaking.  Good stocks and good bonds will generally be good stocks and bonds over the long term.  Severe inflation is not likely to last longer than a few years before the fed can launch an effective counter-attack, so there is not much sense in shifting one’s entire portfolio to fight its ugly face.  Focus on value and don’t get sidetracked by speed bumps like inflation.

  • Share/Bookmark

Forget the Stock Craze: Asset Allocation for Intelligent Investors

July 21st, 2009

stock-chart-downWhat is a good asset mix?
I have heard a lot of talk on this topic, and there are a lot of simple rules that are ran through the media and personal finance circles.  They tend to vary on the theme that you should be heavier in stocks the younger you are.  One popular rule of thumb is to subtract your age from 100 to get the correct allocation of stocks for your portfolio.  These recommendations tend to get inflated towards a stock-heavy bias the more stratospheric the stock market gets, often at the investor’s detriment when things come crashing down.

I won’t rely on my own advice in this department as a mere peon, but will refer to the Abraham of value investing, Benjamin Graham,  who offered a different perspective in his book The Intelligent Investor.  First, he suggests that a portfolio strategy depends primarily on two things:

  1. What is the goal for the investment? With this question, Graham suggests that age is not important, but investment time line.  A woman who is 90, but has a solid pension that she lives on completely, can invest her remaining portfolio completely in stocks with no real risk to her well-being.  A 25 year old, on the other hand, saving for a home in the next five years, has a very different goal and should invest more conservatively.  To this end, Graham encourages considering goals in the formulation of an asset plan.
  2. What is cheap? Here is where Graham diverges heavily from the mainstream.  Graham, like most value investors, considers stocks and bonds — when purchased below fair value — risk neutral.  He suggests only that an investor, given equal value in both, favor bonds because of their higher standing in bankruptcy proceedings.

The practical application of this is that Graham suggests that an investor should shift to a higher bond allocation as stock prices increase, as measured by market price to earnings ratios (I discussed one way of doing this in an earlier post).  Such an approach would have saved millions of investors their 401K’s in the last year — as stocks increased to absurd highs in 2007, an intelligent value investor would have been almost completely allocated in bonds.

Graham Recognizes that We Are Dumb

As a hedge against our natural tendency to get great and seek higher returns, Graham suggests that an investor should — regardless of age — have at least 25 to 75 percent of his/her portfolio in treasuries, and investment-grade bonds.  In suggesting this, Graham points out — writing in 1949 — that there are significant periods of time when bonds outperform stocks and vice versa.  By maintaining a large bond portfolio, and investor does not get tempted into chasing stock returns when stocks are overbought, or when bonds are actually outperforming stocks over time.

What if I Am Lazy?

I don’t blame you if you don’t want to be constantly watching the markets and determining where the values are.  I enjoy it, but many don’t.  Graham also understood the need for people to have a worry-free portfolio.

For the lazy investor, Graham suggested an equal balance of stocks and bonds.  To best achieve this, the modern investor would invest half of their money in an S&P 500 index mutual fund, and half in a treasury and investment-grade bond index mutual fund.  I don’t like Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), so I will ignore those, but they are an option that would achieve the same effect (even if I don’t recommend it).  The funds should be low-cost and no-load, and it is further advised that the investor have an international stock fund and an international bond fund (as much as 25% of the portfolio for each would not be too much), which will protect the investor from currency risk and an underperforming U.S. economy scenario.

Yeah, 50% in bonds, really. Think about that for a minute.  Not when you are fifty or seventy.  When you are 10, or 25.  I think most people today understand the wisdom in this suggestion, while I probably would have been booed off of the internet two years ago for suggesting it was a good idea.  People, just as they did in Graham’s day, fall in love with the adrenaline, thrill, and sky’s-the-limit prospects of the stock market.  The reality is that over any random period of time, your odds are roughly 50-50 in besting the bond market or not.  Repeat this to yourself:  bond is not a dirty word.

Update for Today

Things were a bit different in Graham’s time.  There were very few choices for investors.  Stocks or bonds.  That was it.

Today there are a lot more avenues for investment.  A good portoflio should include a fair mix of assets from other markets — including real estate (REIT funds), and commodities (oil, natural gas, agriculture, minerals — there are several broad commodity index funds to chose from).  Graham also discusse the potential value in a diverse portfolio of junk bonds, also known as high yield bonds.  Graham concluded that the average investor could not diversify enough in this market to minimize risk sufficiently, but today’s investor has access to hundreds of high yield bond funds that spread risk over thousands of bonds, and should definitely be in any portfolio.

So next time you read an article emphasizing the you-must-be-an-idiot-if-you-are-not-xy-percent-in-the-stock-market-or-you-will-die-poor-and-alone, think about the market today, and remember Graham’s advice.

  • Share/Bookmark